Then the timeline snaps back to Europe and the crisis of the late Middle Ages. The conversation follows demographic collapse from the Great Famine through the Black Death, including how plague spread and why it hit with such force. From there, it moves through religious turmoil tied to the Avignon papacy and growing resentment of clerical wealth, plus the long-running battles over heresy that set the stage for later upheaval.

Finally, the episode returns to political instability, from uprisings in Flanders and France to the burdens of the Hundred Years’ War, shifting labor laws, Parliament’s pushback, and England’s convulsions from Edward II to Edward III to Richard II. It closes with the Peasants’ Revolt, court politics, a cascade of titles and rivalries, and the fall of Richard II as Henry Bolingbroke takes the crown as Henry IV, with a tease of more turmoil before the Tudors.

We start with a well-respected Lord Edward ascending to the throne after the long but embattled reign of his father, King Henry III. Despite the instability of Henry’s reign, it is a bit shocking how welcomed Edward was by the barons to take power. He was on crusade at the time, and we tease out the linkage between him and the popular video game series Assassin’s Creed in the cold open. The details of Edward I’s reign required knowledge that we covered in Episode 12 (“Things We Didn’t Tell You in Season One”) including deeper dives into Wales and Scotland. It was against these kingdoms where Edward flexed his powers though the reality deviates pretty significantly from the depictions in Braveheart and Robert the Bruce.

We then shift to the absolutely disastrous reign of Edward II, the first Prince of Wales. Generally rated as one of the worst English kings in history, Edward suffered military embarrassment and raised eyebrows (and ire) with his unique relationships with Piers Gaveston and Hugh Despenser. Parliament and the barons put tight reins on his reign; later, the barons revolted in civil war, led by the king’s cousin and other powerful lords. His wife, with the support of her brother, the king of France, and select barons, eventually led the effort to depose and execute the Edward.

The last part of the episode covers Edward III, who, in turn, deposed his mother’s regency and came to control the kingdom in his own right. Here we get the launch of the Hundred Years’ War over pride and succession challenges back in France. We end the episode with Edward at the height of his power; military victories against the French would result in the King of France imprisoned in London.

Topics in this episode:

• Early imperial elections after Otto III and the king of the Romans title

• The Stauffers and the Welfs, plus the Ghibelline and Guelph factions

• Frederick II’s deposition in 1245, William of Holland and the Great Interregnum

• The seven prince electors and the contested 1254 election between Richard of Cornwall and Alfonso II of Castile

• Rudolf of Habsburg’s election in 1273, later Habsburg influence and Albert’s election in 1298

• Wales from Offa’s Dyke to Gruffudd ap Llywelyn, Llywelyn the Great and the Marcher lords

• Scotland from the Picts and Gaels to Malcolm III, the Dunkeld line and the Treaty of York in 1237

• Norway’s role in northern politics, including control of the Hebrides, Orkney and Shetland

• The Low Countries, the county of Flanders, English wool and the trade cities of Bruges and Ghent

• The Champagne fairs, the growth of Italian merchant banking and the Knights Templar’s financial system

• The position of Jews in medieval Europe, including moneylending, Aaron of Lincoln, the York massacre and the 1255 Lincoln accusation

• The rise of universities in Bologna, Paris and Oxford and the development of English common law through writs, precedent and administrative expansion under Edward I

• Subscribe to the History of Modern Politics feed - ⁠https://link.chtbl.com/history-of-modern-politics⁠

• Join the Substack - ⁠https://www.historyofmodernpolitics.com/⁠

• Subscribe on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@historyofmodernpolitics5701⁠https://www.youtube.com/@historyofmodernpolitics5701⁠

Outline & Structure

In one of our first newsletters to introduce the show, we shared a “very tentative” outline for the entire series: six seasons of eight episodes each. I’m still not certain how many episodes we will do when it’s all said and done, but we definitely are stretching out the early seasons compared to the initial plan.

The original plan of eight episodes for Season 1 were going to cover British History from Rome to the Glorious Revolution. This did not go as planned. There was so much more that we wanted to cover just on Roman history that we ended up using three episodes just for that arc (instead of just one). Magna Carta (1215) was supposed to be before the midpoint of the season, but this changed as we started to build out content past the first three episodes on the Roman period.

Turns out, that to really capture the context of the Magna Carta, it was important to ensure the proximate causes are understood: namely, a) King John being downright horrible, b) the massive debt and taxation burden facing John and his barons, and c) the dynamic between Pope Innocent III and the kingdom of England. We can take “a” for granted (though, understanding the family dynamics of King Henry II and his progeny is critical), but the debt and taxation, in turn, required exposition on the Angevin Empire and the Crusades. Understanding Pope Innocent III similarly requires background on both the Crusades and the very notion of the Papal States. We could continue walking backward from here, but hopefully this illustrates the point. Further, Magna Carta did have some precedence from Anglo-Saxon (pre-Norman) tradition and even the Coronation Charter of King Henry I.

Bottom line: Chris and I felt pretty good about our understanding of history when we started, but we realized that there is a lot of important context and interesting history that truly allowed us to understand how and why the fateful day at Runnymede went down.

What looked like we could do in eight episodes ballooned to about twenty.

Subscribe now

Production

We recorded Season 1 throughout the course of 2021 with the intent to stay a few episodes in front of our release cycle. And, we did decide to release our first block of episodes to paid subscribers (primarily via Chris’s podcast network) before going to a public feed. Episodes began to drop in May 2021. New episodes remained pretty consistent through the end of 2021 wrapping up with Episode 11.

Now, I’ll be honest with you… Episode 11 was not supposed to be the last episode of Season 1. In fact, in the recording (which unfortunately has a view audio glitches due to bandwidth on my end) we do not say anywhere that it is the end of Season 1. I made the call to end Season 1 with the eleventh episode because a) I was falling behind on developing notes and transcripts for the following episodes, b) the “Birth of Parliament” did seem like a pretty natural breakpoint, and c) we released the episode in late 2021 which also seemed like a good breakpoint between seasons.

That’s why we ended up stopping at Episode 11—or at least call it the end of Season 1.

Our production process also evolved over the first season. For the first episode, very little of our notes were transcribed literally. Even the cold open was unscripted. We had a bullet-point outline with some notes and a handful of quotes. It worked ok, but it made us both a little uneasy in our delivery. For the next two episodes, the cold opens were fully scripted, and we had a bit more structure in the outline including some notional timing suggestions to help us stay on track.

By Episode 4, we moved to a fully scripted outline. That said, we’ve tried to keep our tone as conversational as possible and will move off script for extra color and insights along the way based on feel. There are some podcasts out there where you can tell it’s all fully scripted and read verbatim. We want to be more conversational but still keep the train on the tracks and hit all the points of content. With a few minor exceptions, we do the episode in one take.

I handle the research and show scripts. Chris handles the editing and publishing.

We both had career and personal changes in 2022 that derailed recording. We tried here and there to get things going again. In furious spurts, I was still able to advance episode scripts; neither of us stopped researching and improving our knowledge of history so that we can share more with you.

Earlier this year (2025), I finally cracked a formula to expedite my writing using ChatGPT as a co-pilot. I’m still fact-checking and reviewing copy. This helped jumpstart script development again. About a month ago, I decided to pursue a career change that will allow me to spend more time on this podcast and some other creative ventures (stay tuned and I’ll share more on those endeavors when appropriate; or just follow me on Substack).

What’s Next?

Well, Season 2 is about to start. Season 3 is making strong progress in pre-production. Barring the unforeseen, we will be back to our regularly scheduled programming here very soon. That’s why the Substack feed has been re-releasing Season 1 (this time for free and not behind the paywall). We’re here to stay!

In Season 2, we’ll pick up in the 13th century, orient ourselves, run through the kings of England from Edward I through the Wars of the Roses covering the Black Death and its impact on politics and the economy along the way. We’ll go through the Tudors and look at broad technological and philosophical changes in Europe at the dawn of the Modern Era including exploration and the Protestant Reformation. That sets the table for the English Civil War and Glorious Revolution. That’s how we’ll wrap Season 2.

In Season 3, we’ll finally cross the Atlantic to look at Colonial America, the American Revolution, and its aftermath.

Here on Substack, I plan to make more frequent posts with episode companions, deeper dives, side stories, and other content. Some of this will be premium content, so please consider upgrading. Now that I’ve changed careers, every little bit will help from you!

Get 25% off for 1 year

See you in Season 2 very soon!

I followed my twisted arm into a quixotic run for Congress in 2016 where I was a guest on his show a couple of times. By that time, Chris and I knew that we had a shared love of history and political thought and philosophy. We recorded a couple of episodes in 2018 that began to form the seeds of our idea to get past the debates of the day and discuss the development of, initially, libertarian thought. But, that gave way to both bigger ideas and personal life distractions. A vision grew but had to wait.

By late 2020, we finally decided to jump in and do this thing. As Chris has noted before, the span of what we wanted to cover changed rapidly from our initial expectations. Here’s one exchange from back in January 2021 as we are beginning to plan the outline:

Matt: We should start an outline, though. Like how much British content do you want before we get to 1789? Or 1764 for that matter?

Chris: I think 89.

Matt: 89 or even 87 is the most important turning point as we get to the Constitutional Convention.

Chris: Oh 17. I thought you meant the glorious Revolution.

Matt: No I’m talking 1787. Your goal was history of the founding era, right? I think we need a deep British exposition to set the stage. But, if we focus on the Founding era, then we’d have a lot of 1787-1812 content.

Before long, I was convinced not only to go back to the Glorious Revolution (which we will finally cover in Season 2), but back to the development of the relationship between king and Parliament that underpinned the events of the 17th century. It didn’t take long to pull that thread to go back to clan-based societies and the influence of the Roman Republic.

In early 2021, the episode outline for Season 1 had eight episodes that would go from Rome to the Glorious Revolution. Once I started writing outlines, it quickly became apparent that we would need to cover French history, papal history, the Crusades, and more. It looked like eight episodes would take more than a dozen to tell the story at the depth we wanted to explore. The outline came together, and we started recording in 2021. The journey began.

Subscribe now

We launched this Substack as one of our platforms for distribution and to provide additional content. In the inaugural post, Chris outlined the goals of the podcast:

1. To understand modern politics, people must have an understanding of how current arguments have developed. One can learn a lot of insight about current events by examining the past.

2. To understand the long fight for societal liberty and personal freedom and why it cannot be squandered.

3. To define modern libertarianism, conservatism, and progressivism through intellectual history.

4. Guide the listener to resources to learn more about the subjects briefly covered in the series.

These goals remain today. This is a passion project that lies at the intersection of our love of history and love of politics—even if the latter is a complicated relationship. We are not who we are today, nor do we think about things today without a lens to the past. The MAGA movement has echos of the past. Social democracy and progressivism have echos of the past. The very notions of Constitutional norms and precedents that capture today’s headlines have their roots in the 1700s which, in turn, have their roots in the 1200s, and so on. The arguments of today require an understanding of the past.

Liberty is a constant tension with power. Hunter-gatherers, members of the clan, subjects of Rome, vassals and peasants, merchants, religious dissidents, pioneers, enslaved individuals, native populations, industrial age workers, and the bourgeoisie all sought liberty as we do today. Those with power, whether through force, decree, institution, or money, have always been on the opposing end of this fight. The battle is as old as time and will not end—but the tides of liberty have ebbed and flowed based on the power structures, living conditions, and events of the age. We hope to showcase these tensions, their proximate causes, and both the victories and losses of liberty through the lens of this podcast.

These battles have been the basis of political thought since Plato and the times before. We chose to start with the Roman Republic because it uniquely shaped the origins of thought in England which, in turn, shaped America. The limits of liberty, the power structures which constrain it, and the terms under which these dynamics should change have been the core issue that political philosophers have grappled with through the ages. However, more than not, it has ironically been the power dynamic between those already in power that have shaped the reality of liberty through the ages. Magna Carta was not birthed by a peasant uprising; it was the result of the king’s powerful and immediate vassals fighting for their liberty—the elite against the elite.

In our journey, we will eventually get to modern day views: conservatives, populists, progressives, institutionalists, libertarians, and other shades of gray. To get there, we will explore thinkers, writers, lawyers, lords, bishops, popes, and kings. Each step of the way will build toward America’s own glorious revolution which we will cover in Season 3, while Season 4 will build on the nation’s birth and take us on the road through American political history as parties developed, changed, and reinvented themselves to meet the demands of their day.

This takes a lot of research. We use primary sources where we can and secondary sources liberally: books, other podcasts, Wikipedia, academic papers, and, yes, now even ChatGPT. We take accuracy seriously and verify details from whatever source as much as we can for the amateur historians that we are.

As we get ready to launch Season 2, in my next post, I’ll share more about the production of Season 1 and the vision we have for the future of the podcast and this Substack feed.

If you can, please consider joining as a premium member. We are listener and reader supported like most of these endeavors. Ratings and reviews are always appreciated on your platform of choice. We will start deploying premium content soon. Act now with the button below to get a discount of the premium membership.

Get 25% off for 1 year

Share The History of Modern Politics

Back in England, the 13th century opened in the shadow of the First Barons’ War. A nine-year-old Henry III was crowned under the protection of William Marshal, the last great knight of the age and the man who steadied the monarchy long enough for it to survive. Henry grew into his kingship, but the memory of civil war never quite left him, nor the nobility. Reissues of Magna Carta was both a gesture of stability and a reminder that royal authority was now conditional, negotiated, and watched.

At the same time, Europe’s intellectual map was changing. The Gregorian Reforms had created a hunger for trained clergy and jurists, and the rediscovery of Justinian’s Corpus Juris Civilis in northern Italy ignited a legal renaissance. New universities rose: Bologna for civil and canon law, Paris for theology, and—thanks to Henry II’s break with the Continent—Oxford, which absorbed exiled English students in 1167 and quickly grew into a center of its own. Knowledge, once confined to monasteries, now belonged to a network of scholars who moved across borders carrying books, ideas, and disputes.

This mattered for England. As continental thinkers rebuilt Roman law, English royal courts continued developing something different: common law. Rooted in precedent rather than codification, administered through royal justices rather than university-trained clerics, it evolved into a uniquely English answer to the same pressures that reshaped Europe. While France and the Empire leaned on the revived civil law, England doubled down on jury verdicts, writs, and the principle that the king’s courts governed the realm—the seeds of constitutional order.

Yet the 13th century was also a reminder that law alone could not discipline power. Henry III’s reliance on foreign favorites, his costly ambitions abroad, and his struggles with taxation sowed the seeds of confrontation with the barons—seeds that will burst open in the Second Barons’ War and the emergence of something new: a Parliament that would speak in the name of the realm.

My takeaway: England’s politics evolved and matured with the dynamics of the monarchy, the barons, and foreign affairs. Crusades faltered, empires clashed, and universities flourished, but the real revolution was quieter: a king accepting that he must govern with limits, and a legal culture learning to speak for the whole community.

Henry II inherited England and a patchwork of territories that stretched from Scotland to the Pyrenees—what historians now call the Angevin Empire. His first task was to impose order after civil war. Royal justices toured the shires; sheriffs were reined in; and the common law began to take form—royal courts enforcing uniform rules in place of feudal custom. Yet Henry’s ambitions ran beyond administration. He sought to bind the Church as firmly as his barons, naming his friend Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury in 1162. Their friendship collapsed over the question of royal control of the clergy. Becket’s murder inside Canterbury Cathedral shocked Christendom and branded Henry’s reign with guilt and reform.

Abroad, Henry fought constantly—against the French crown, against rebellious nobles, and eventually against his own sons. Eleanor of Aquitaine, once his ally, became his rival, backing the sons’ uprisings. The Angevin domains survived Henry’s death only to fracture under Richard I, whose glory in the Third Crusade bankrupted the realm, and under John, whose failures in France exposed the limits of royal power.

By 1215, John’s losses and heavy taxation brought open revolt. The barons forced him to seal the Magna Carta, a document that put restraint on the king; even a king must keep his word. Though annulled within months, it endured as precedent: that law stands above the ruler.

My takeaway: Henry II built the machinery of English law to strengthen kingship; his heirs proved that the same machinery could limit it. The empire he forged unraveled, but the idea he left behind—that justice must answer to more than might—became England’s most lasting conquest.

For a time, that alliance with the Franks bound the Church to rising northern power. The Carolingians defended Rome, and Rome sanctified their rule. But by the tenth century, papal politics had curdled into patronage and scandal—pontiffs made and unmade by local nobles and imperial meddling. Reform came slowly, carried first by monastic movements like Cluny, which preached clerical discipline and moral renewal. When Pope Gregory VII took office in 1073, those ideals became policy. His Gregorian Reforms demanded clerical celibacy, denounced simony, and—most provocatively—asserted that only the pope could appoint bishops. That declaration sparked the Investiture Controversy, pitting the papacy against emperors and kings from Germany to England, and redefining obedience within Christendom.

Meanwhile, a new Norman energy was reshaping Europe from two directions. In the south, a different branch of Normans—adventurers from the same northern stock but unconnected to William’s line—conquered southern Italy and Sicily under leaders like Robert Guiscard and Roger Hauteville. Their kingdom fused Latin, Greek, and Arab traditions, becoming both a bridge and a buffer between Christendom and the Muslim world. The papacy, surrounded by rivals in Italy, found in these Normans a crucial ally—and sometimes a reminder that its own warriors could be as ambitious as its emperors.

Out of this shifting political and spiritual order came the first great call to arms. In 1095, Pope Urban II summoned Europe’s knights to reclaim Jerusalem. The First Crusade bound Christendom to a single purpose, channeling feudal violence into holy war and briefly uniting rival kingdoms under the sign of the cross. When Jerusalem fell in 1099, the papacy’s prestige soared, and a new network of faith, commerce, and diplomacy began to knit the Mediterranean together. Italian ports thrived on crusader traffic; the Norman lords of Sicily supplied men and ships; and the idea of Christian Europe gained both definition and ambition.

In that newly connected world, dynasties turned faith and geography into power. Half a century later, Eleanor of Aquitaine—heiress to one of Europe’s richest duchies and a veteran of crusade herself—married Henry Plantagenet, soon to be Henry II of England. Their union linked the culture of southern France to the political might of the north, forming the Angevin Empire and tying the Channel kingdoms to the same Mediterranean sphere that the Crusades had opened.

My takeaway: The genius of the medieval Church was structure not holiness. In reforming itself, it built the first truly European institution, one that could outlast kings, command armies, and shape imagination. The papacy reinvented Rome’s empire and put the economic, political, and martial power of kings behind its initiatives.

After William’s death, succession passed uneasily between his sons: William II (Rufus) and then Henry I, who tightened royal control and sought to temper baronial excess. The episode opens with Henry’s Charter of Liberties, a remarkable document that prefigures later constitutional ideas. It promises fair inheritance, lawful justice, and moderation in royal power—an attempt to steady a realm strained by decades of exploitation. But good governance depended on stability, and Henry’s dynasty would soon fail him.

When Henry I died in 1135 without a legitimate son due to the White Ship disaster, his daughter Matilda—the “Empress,” widow of the Holy Roman Emperor—was his designated heir. Many nobles had sworn to her, but when the moment came, they turned to Stephen of Blois, William the Conqueror’s grandson. What followed was two decades of shifting alliances, sieges, and betrayals—a civil war remembered simply as The Anarchy. Matilda and Stephen fought across both England and Normandy, their fortunes rising and falling with each campaign.

By 1153, exhaustion forced compromise. Stephen would remain king, but the crown would pass to Matilda’s son Henry FitzEmpress. When Stephen died the next year, Henry II ascended peacefully, uniting England and much of western France under what historians call the Angevin Empire. The scars of The Anarchy, though, endured: England had learned how fragile centralized power could be—and how often legitimacy depended on consensus as much as blood.

My takeaway: Norman rule promised order through hierarchy, but it delivered recurring instability. The machinery William built—strong kingship, legal reform, and feudal control—could survive invasion but not uncertainty at the top. The Anarchy exposes the paradox of the new England: a kingdom powerful enough to dominate Europe, yet still vulnerable to the same dynastic fragility that had once undone the Anglo-Saxons.

Godwinson inherits a kingdom caught between legacies. The Anglo-Saxon system prizes counsel, custom, and elective kingship through the witan; the Danish influence—after the recent Danish kings of England, Sweyn Forkbeard and Cnut the Great—has left behind a taste for centralized authority and a warrior’s code of loyalty. England in 1066 is not an isolated island; it is a northern kingdom, fluent in both languages of power.

In September, Hardrada lands in the north, joined by Godwinson’s exiled brother Tostig. The English army marches hard and wins decisively at Stamford Bridge, killing both Hardrada and Tostig. It’s a triumph, but one that drains men and strength. Three weeks later, William crosses the Channel, and Godwinson turns south to meet him at Hastings. There, after a day of grinding combat, the English shield wall finally breaks, and Godwinson falls—the last crowned Anglo-Saxon king of England, slain in the same season as the last great Viking.

My takeaway: 1066 closes one world and opens another. The deaths of Hardrada and Godwinson mark the passing of the old northern order—the shared Norse and Anglo-Saxon world of kinship, oath, and counsel. In its place rises a new structure, imported from Normandy and bound to France by blood, marriage, and feudal debt. This is not the end of England; it’s a new chapter where it is absorbed, redirected, and set on a path by the Norman conquerors. This will define its conflicts for centuries: kings ruling an island while expected to answer to the French king as vassals.

Across the ninth century, the Norse and Danes press deep into the island’s river valleys. Some burn, others bargain, and still others stay. From their settlements in the east—the Danelaw—commerce and culture take on a new rhythm. The once-competing English kingdoms face an existential test: adapt, or disappear.

Out of that storm rises Alfred of Wessex (r. 871–899). His victories over the Great Heathen Army are only half the story. The other half is what he builds afterward: fortified burhs, reorganized levies, codified law, and a program of education meant to pull his people out of illiteracy and despair. Alfred sees rulership not as domination but as stewardship—the king as learner and teacher. It’s governance as moral labor.

Even as he looks inward, Alfred looks outward. Marriage alliances and clerical exchanges link Wessex to the Frankish world, where proto-feudal ideas—land for service, hierarchy for protection—are already reshaping power. The English crown borrows freely: continental advisors, Latin scholarship, and the language of covenant between lord and man. The result is an early hybrid—a kingdom with Roman memory, Germanic custom, and Christian legitimacy.

His heirs finish what he began. Edward the Elder and Æthelstan weld Wessex, Mercia, and Northumbria into a single polity. But the cross-Channel ties endure: dynastic marriages bind England to Normandy, and Frankish models of tenure and loyalty slowly take root in English soil. The foundations of later feudal England are laid, not in conquest, but in imitation and necessity.

My takeaway: Alfred’s greatness isn’t just survival—it’s synthesis. He turns invasion into invention, defeat into design. Where others saw chaos, he built structure: walls, laws, and words that could outlast the sword. In a century defined by fragmentation, Alfred re-learned what Rome once knew—that power endures only when it educates.

By that time, the Western Roman Empire is gone in all but memory. The cracks widened first under internal decay—weak emperors, divided loyalties, and the slow drain of gold and grain from the provinces. Then came the final blows: Attila’s Huns storming across the Danube, and Pope Leo the Great’s fateful meeting with him at the gates of Rome, where words, not weapons, bought the city’s survival. But moral authority could not replace material power. The empire that had once claimed the world now ruled little more than a rumor.

Out of the ruins rose a new order in Gaul. The Frankish king Clovis stitched together rival tribes and, in a moment of political genius, accepted Christian baptism around 500 CE. His conversion aligned the Franks with the Latin Church, giving divine sanction to their rule and linking their kingdom to Rome’s surviving prestige. Under the Merovingians, the machinery of empire—law, taxation, and letters—lurched back to life, even as palace intrigue and hereditary division pulled it apart again.

That weakness set the stage for the Carolingians. Charles Martel forged unity through war; Pepin the Short sealed an alliance with the papacy; and Charlemagne—king, conqueror, and reluctant emperor—built the greatest realm Western Europe had seen since Caesar. When Pope Leo III crowned him on Christmas Day 800, the idea of “Europe” found a political form. Yet even that achievement carried its flaw: Salic law, which split inheritance among sons, fractured Charlemagne’s empire after his death and ensured that unity in the West would always be fleeting.

My takeaway: Episode 5 marks the hinge between worlds. Islam’s expansion, Rome’s collapse, and the rise of the Franks aren’t separate stories—they’re parts of one great transition. Out of conquest and conversion, Europe’s medieval order takes shape: an age defined less by darkness than by reorganization, where faith and power learn to share a crown.

Across the fifth and sixth centuries, people from the north German coast and southern Denmark—Angles, Saxons, Jutes—begin to settle. They follow the trade winds and tidal flats, crossing not as an invasion force but in steady, generational waves. Roman towns shrink, villas crumble, and the Latin of administration gives way to new dialects. Power becomes local again—rooted in kin, oath, and proximity to the sea.

By the sixth century, familiar names emerge: Kent, Wessex, Essex, East Anglia, Northumbria. Timber halls replace forums; kingship becomes personal, martial, and portable. These early realms eventually knit into what chroniclers later called the Heptarchy—seven principal kingdoms locked in rivalries and marriages, trading power and tribute in rough balance. Within that system rose the so-called bretwaldas, “wide-rulers” whose influence reached beyond their borders. The best remembered is Offa of Mercia in the late eighth century, whose dyke cut the landscape from sea to sea and whose coinage rivaled Charlemagne’s. His reign hinted that something like a single English polity was possible, even if unity was still centuries off.

Christianity was arriving again to the island just as Germanic migrants. In 597 CE Augustine of Canterbury landed in Kent, sent by Pope Gregory the Great, and found a foothold at the court of King Æthelberht and his Frankish Christian queen. From that seed grew a network of monasteries and missions—Lindisfarne, Iona, Canterbury—that re-stitched the island’s spiritual fabric. Christianity gave the new kingdoms a shared vocabulary of law, literacy, and legitimacy, connecting them again to the wider world Rome had once ruled.

My takeaway: this episode isn’t about the disappearance of the Romans; it’s about persistence and evolution through change. Rome’s scaffolding collapses, but the impulse to order, to rule, to belong, endures. When the legions left, the lights didn’t go out—they moved to different hearths. Out of migration, memory, and makeshift rule, a new language and landscape took hold—the foundations of the England to come.

After the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian tries a structural fix. He shares rule (the Tetrarchy), stages the imperial office above everyone else, doubles the provinces and groups them into dioceses, and vastly expands the bureaucracy to count, tax, and supply. Then—remarkably—he abdicates in 305, a planned exit that briefly stabilizes succession.

Constantine inherits that machine from Britain’s doorstep: his father Constantius dies at York in 306, the army acclaims him, and a long civil-war grind ends with sole rule by 324. Along the way come the Milvian Bridge (312) and the Edict of Milan (313), which legalizes Christianity and redirects imperial legitimacy through new channels.

But Britain never stops feeling like a frontier. From Magnus Maximus (383) to a string of usurpers, imperial attention keeps drifting. General Stilicho pulls troops off the island; Constantine III rises; and, with defenses collapsing, Honorius tells the Britons to look to their own protection—around 410, the same year Rome is sacked. Britain is, effectively, on its own.

My one big takeaway: collapse is an ending, but it’s also a handoff. When the center retreats, the peripheries improvise—Britain shifts from a Roman province to a patchwork of post-Roman powers, carrying shards of Roman law, roads, and memory into what comes next.

Nearly a century later, Emperor Claudius finished what the Republic would not. With better logistics, political incentives, and client-king alliances, the invasion of 43 CE put real Roman weight on British soil. Roads, forts, tribute, and law followed. Resistance did too. (File that tension—imperial order vs. local autonomy—for later episodes.)

What sticks with me here is the handoff. Caesar represents the late-Republic pattern: personal glory, workaround campaigns, and spectacle. Claudius represents the imperial machine: bureaucracy, supply chains, and permanence. Same shoreline, different lens. One tests the door; the other installs the lock.

If Episode 1 asked why we start on the edge of Rome, Episode 2 shows how edges get absorbed—and at what cost. The island’s politics begin to rewire: tribes negotiating with governors, client kings hedging bets, and new elites emerging in the slipstream of conquest. Britain isn’t “Roman” yet, but it’s no longer just Britain either.

Next time, we’ll watch what empire builds—and what it breaks—once the governors unpack their ledgers.

Two origin stories open our series: Britain’s myths and Rome’s machinery. Bede and Geoffrey of Monmouth hand us legend—Albion renamed for a Trojan castaway; a past constructed for meaning. Useful, but not the whole story. The other lens is institutional: the Roman Republic’s language of assemblies, magistrates, and a senate—checks that worked, then frayed.

Why Britain first? Because its location at the edge made it unique. Hard to conquer, close enough to trade, the island absorbed ideas without being swallowed by them. The English Channel kept Britain just out of reach for Rome. It’s a perfect laboratory for what happens when clan loyalties meet outside power.

That’s the deeper thread: societies built on kin—status, honor, obligation—slowly learning the grammar of contracts, offices, and law that apply to individuals. You can feel that tension long before there’s a “state” in the modern sense.

Enter Rome as both model and warning. The Republic innovates; ambition erodes it. From the Gracchi to Marius to Sulla, the norms snap one by one—until Caesar turns workaround into system. Money, muscle, maneuver.

My one big takeaway: origins don’t dictate outcomes, but they fix the questions a people keep asking. On Britain’s shores, myth met institution—and politics, as we know it, began. Next episode, we wade from legend into invasion.

Subscribe now

I recently attended a talkshop by historian Dan Miller on five past Presidential elections that could inform the contest in 2024. I sat down with him to discuss parts of this fascinating presentation.

Visit Dan's website - https://historicalsolutions.com/

Transcript - https://share.descript.com/view/TlaNaGBl4Jw

Links:

• Book by Laurence Bergreen: Columbus: The Four Voyages, 1492-1504 - https://amzn.to/3MlTHDz

• Columbus in America (Full Documentary) -

• Secrets & Mysteries of Christopher Columbus -

• 9 reasons Christopher Columbus was a murderer, tyrant, and scoundrel - https://www.vox.com/2014/10/13/6957875/christopher-columbus-murderer-tyrant-scoundrel

• Columbus Day - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbus_Day

• Christopher Columbus - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus

• Bartolomé de las Casas - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartolom%c3%a9_de_las_Casas

• What Columbus Day Really Means - https://theamericanscholar.org/what-columbus-day-really-means/

• How Columbus Day Fell Victim to Its Own Success - https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/how-columbus-day-fell-victim-to-its-own-success/261922/

• How Italians Became ‘White’ (Published 2019) - https://buff.ly/2pbSUyJ

• What Are We to Make of Columbus Today? - https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/10/11/what-are-we-to-make-of-columbus-today/

Join WAL Plus now for commercial-free shows and our complete archives - JoinWALPlus.com

----

This episode is brought to you by Iconic Insurance. Fifteen percent of Americans are left to find health insurance on their own. You might feel overwhelmed, lost, or frustrated, and if that's you, feel in control of your health with Matt Allen's help. Visit www.iconic-insurance.com/libertarians to get started.

---

Chris Spangle and Leaders and Legends, LLC edited and produced this podcast. If you're interested in starting a podcast or taking yours to the next level, please contact us at LeadersAndLegends.net.

----

Looking to start a podcast? Download my podcast Podcasting and Platforms now, and check out my recommendations for buying the right equipment.

----

Q Sleep Spray assists in achieving a more restful sleep so you can wake up refreshed. Q SLEEP contains incredible ingredients, including melatonin, 5-HTP, and L-theanine, as well as a proprietary herbal extract, which synergistically promotes restful sleep and helps your mind and body rejuvenate. Buy Now - https://wearelibertarians.com/sleepspray/

Show Notes - https://wearelibertarians.com/wp-c…

Read more